Police report shows the cash theft right after the theft. and he's also a student with loans and grants. Plaintiff has a property investment business, and sells leggings online. Defendant's sworn statement, and testimony keep changing. Plaintiff went looking for her, and didn't find her, and his cash was missing. Next morning the defendant went to her meeting, and the transit company that escorts her called asking where she was. But defendant slept in same room as plaintiff after the TV was broken. A few days later they had an argument over defendant's drug use.ĭefendant threw bottle at TV, now has no picture. Two weeks later, defendant was kicked out by her mother, and she stayed with plaintiff for a while. Defendant and plaintiff lived together, and then when he moved, and he took defendant back to her mother's home. During an argument plaintiff says defendant broke the TV, other property, and stole $2700 cash. Plaintiff let homeless defendant move in to help her out. ![]() Homeless Ex Assaults TV?!-Plaintiff Allen Cox suing former girlfriend Stephanie Glover that he allowed to move in with him, and says defendant stole his cash, $2700 and broke his TV. $1250 to plaintiffs for the six months of lease. Why would plaintiffs put out feeders, build shooting lanes, and other work if they weren't hunting? Also, I agree that the plaintiffs lied about their hunting, how many animals they killed, and everything else they said. I disagree with giving anything to the plaintiffs, they treated the land like they owned it. Plaintiffs also moved a full trailer onto the property he was leasing, and claims he didn't kill any animals the first year. Defendant says John Bowers told him in a phone call about the fight over frog legs, During that conversation, defendant says plaintiff husband boasted about killing numerous hogs, and white tailed deer, and never told defendant about it. Defendant says plaintiff husband told him about the excess carnage, after defendant was called to property after plaintiffs and another hunter were arguing about frog legs. The written rules are that hunters have to notify defendant before leaving property how many animals they killed. It cost $2,500 for the year of hunting.ĭefendant says other hunters with leases said plaintiffs 'harvested' many times the legal number on his property. Plaintiffs claim they have no idea why their lease was terminated. Plaintiffs had leased for one year, and then the second year is when their lease was terminated. However, defendant told plaintiffs their lease was cancelled after they hunted turkey, and deer for six months on the lease. ![]() Plaintiff prepaid, and wants every penny back. Landowner leases land for hunting, but says there are legal limits for each species, and that defendants went way over the limits. Hog Hunting, Deer Shooting- Plaintiff Candice Bowers and husband John Bowers is suing defendant / landowner Louie Esparza over her denial of a hunting lease on his property. Plaintiff receives $600 for dog, and travel expenses. ![]() Defendant's defamation counter claim is dismissed. JJ gives defendant six weeks to get dog neutered, and confirmation will be supplied to the show, or JJ will give plaintiff an order to get the dog back. (What's to stop defendant from taking another dog to a vet that doesn't know the Pomeranian, and claiming that's the dog in question? Getting that one spayed Plaintiff has ads showing that he breeds and sells 28 breeds of dogs. JJ says she won't pay the defendant, and wife's expenses until it is confirmed that Pomeranian is spayed. JJ points out that plaintiff drove six hours to collect the money at defendant's house.ĭefendant claims the Pomeranian won't be bred in his program, but isn't going to spay the female. ![]() Defendant supports himself by breeding and selling all kinds of dogs, German Shepherds, and other breeds. Defendant has eight dogs in his house, and about 30 outside (it sounds like a puppy mill). However, plaintiff was appalled at the conditions, and the number of dogs at defendant's home. Defendant refused to give up the puppy, and then claimed he would pay the $300. So plaintiff drove to defendant's house, with the intent of repossessing the puppy. Plaintiff did breed a litter, and now has five, but only keeps the dogs Plaintiff sold one female to defendant, for $500, and he paid $200 down, and owed $300. Plaintiff bought a puppy from defendant, which she still has. Neuter the Puppy or Lose the Puppy! -Plaintiff / breeder Linda Moore suing defendant Rodney Larson over the cost, or return of a Pomeranian puppy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |